Political office holders will be affected in the on-going trimming of the Kaduna State work force, Governor Nasir El-Rufai, has hinted.
He hinged the sack of some workers by his administration on dwindling allocation from the Federation Account and rising wage bill.
The governor said his administration took the option because public finances have been overstretched by the higher wage bills without commensurate increase in subventions from the Federation Account Allocations Committee (FAAC).
According to him, what the state has been receiving from FAAC since the middle of last year, like most other sub-nationals, can barely pay salaries and overheads.
He disclosed that the rationalisation will be extended to his political aides in the government’s quest to save funds and ensure that a strong and efficient public service exists to use those resources to implement progressive programmes and projects for development.
El-Rufai made the clarification in a statement by his Special Adviser on Media and Communication, Muyiwa Adekeye.
The statement reads: In November 2020, KDSG had only N162.9 million left after paying salaries. That month, Kaduna State got N4.83 billion from FAAC and paid N4.66 billion as wages.
“In the last six months, personnel costs have accounted for between 84.97% and 96.63% of FAAC transfers received by the Kaduna State Government. In March 2021, Kaduna State had only N321m left after settling personnel costs.
“That month, the state got N4.819 billion from FAAC and paid out N4.498 billion, representing 93% of the money received. This does not include standing orders for overheads, funding security operations, running costs of schools and hospitals, and other overhead costs that the state has to bear for the machinery of government to run, for which the state government taps into IGR earnings.”
The statement quoted El-Rufai as arguing that the government “was elected to develop the state, not just to pay the salaries of public servants.
“It was elected to promote equality of opportunity, to build and run schools and hospitals, upgrade infrastructure and make the state more secure and attractive to the private sector for jobs and investments.
“In September 2019, Kaduna State Government became the first government in the country to pay the new minimum wage and consequential adjustments. The state government followed this up by increasing the minimum pension of persons on the defined benefits scheme to N30, 000 monthly.
“This step to advance the welfare of workers significantly increased the wage burden of the state government and immediately sapped up the funds of many local governments.
“While the Kaduna State Government believes that public sector wages overall are still relatively low, their current levels are obviously limited by the resources available to the government.’’
The statement added: “What each public servant earns might be puny in comparison to private sector wages, but the total wage bill consumes much of the revenues of the state.”
He, however, argued that, the desire to pay more is a sentiment that must bow to the limits prescribed by the ability to pay.
“Therefore, the state government has no choice but to shed some weight and reduce the size of the public service. It is a painful but necessary step to take, for the sake of the majority of the people of this state.”
Justifying the job cut, the statement said: “The public service of the state with less than 100,000 employees (and their families) cannot be consuming more than 90% of government resources, with little left to positively impact the lives of the more than nine million that are not political appointees or civil servants. It is gross injustice for such a micro-minority to consume the majority of the resources of the state.”
The governor also argued that, the measures which government took to cope with the Covid-19 pandemic have shown clearly that the public service requires much fewer persons than it currently employs.
According to him, “the public service is an important institution, and it should therefore maintain only an optimum size. Faced with a difficult situation, the government is persuaded that it cannot refuse to act or act in ways that are only conducive to populist sentiment, without solving the fundamental problem.”